This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
floating_point_comparison [2022/04/29 23:45] max |
floating_point_comparison [2022/04/29 23:54] (current) max |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| The default option is a combination of both the absolute and relative methods of epsilon comparison. ((http:// | The default option is a combination of both the absolute and relative methods of epsilon comparison. ((http:// | ||
| The second option is simply the computer' | The second option is simply the computer' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Which method the engine uses can be changed in the source code in the '' | ||
| ===== The absolute method ===== | ===== The absolute method ===== | ||
| Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
| ===== The relative method ===== | ===== The relative method ===== | ||
| - | The relative method takes the result of the absolute method | + | The relative method takes the absolute method, but multiplies the epsilon by '' |
| The drawback to this method is that it does not work on small values. | The drawback to this method is that it does not work on small values. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
| Considering the strengths and drawbacks of the two methods above, you can combine the two to overcome these limitations. | Considering the strengths and drawbacks of the two methods above, you can combine the two to overcome these limitations. | ||
| - | The combined method takes the result of the absolute | + | The combined method takes the relative |
| This method gives us good results, but it is not without its drawbacks since it uses the same epsilon for the relative and the absolute tolerance. | This method gives us good results, but it is not without its drawbacks since it uses the same epsilon for the relative and the absolute tolerance. | ||
| For further reading, please check out [[http:// | For further reading, please check out [[http:// | ||